RENEW
A photograph of an apiarist managing his hives.

Ecological Sensemaking in Organisations: Understanding Biodiversity, Nature Loss and Organisational Responsibility

Published on 10 April 2024


Research team

Patrick Oko Quaye – University of Exeter

A profile picture of Co Lead Gail Whiteman

Gail Whiteman – University of Exeter

A profile image iof Stefano Pascucci

Stefano Pascucci – University of Exeter

A profile photograph of Ryan Nolan

Ryan Nolan – University of Salford

Aims

Many global businesses are struggling with how to identify and assess their impacts and dependencies on nature. In our work with the CBI, the Nature of Business, CBI and the RENEW team within the University of Exeter found that businesses are grappling with the complexity of the issues and a lack of guidance.

Dr Patrick Oko Quaye’s PhD examined how biodiversity and nature loss become meaningful within organisations, how associated responsibilities emerge and evolve, and how organisational contexts enable or constrain their embedding in organisational practices.

The thesis, Ecological Sensemaking in Organisations: Formative Experiences, Managerial Ambivalence, and the Precarious Embedding of Biodiversity and Nature Loss, comprised three empirical studies examining the experiential, managerial and organisational processes through which ecological concerns become noticed, interpreted and translated into organisational action.

The research developed from an interest in how managers make sense of businesses’ biodiversity impacts into a broader examination of ecological sensemaking in organisations: how people encounter, interpret and give meaning to biodiversity and nature loss, and how these meanings shape organisational responsibilities and responses.

Findings

This PhD research found:

  • Managers’ ecological orientations cannot be understood solely through long-term, place-based immersion in local ecosystems. Ecological concerns become meaningful through interconnected experiential, interpretive and organisational processes that shape how they are understood, negotiated and translated into organisational practice.
  • Formative experiences with biodiversity and nature shape managers’ ecological orientations within firms. Drawing on in-depth interviews with office-based managers, it found that vivid encounters with nature—whether direct or mediated—can be retained because of their emotional intensity, sensory vividness and cognitive salience. These retained experiences become interpretive anchors that can subsequently influence how managers orient themselves towards ecological issues, even when they are geographically or symbolically distant from the ecosystems concerned.
  • Three interrelated enablers of sustained sustainability work among sustainability professionals: active agency, contextual understanding and political positioning amid shifting organisational dynamics. The findings show that managers actively interpret and negotiate organisational tensions, drawing on their understanding of context and organisational dynamics to sustain sustainability agendas amid competing priorities.
  • The research also examined how biodiversity and nature loss are made sense of within organisations. Drawing on in-depth interviews with sustainability professionals and corporate sustainability and integrated annual reports, it identified three mechanisms—triggering, interpretive framing and translational embedding—through which biodiversity and nature loss can become organisationally actionable despite their temporal distance, spatial diffusion and experiential absence.
  • The research showed that the same organisational processes that make biodiversity and nature loss visible and actionable can also constrain how these issues are understood and operationalised. This helps explain why corporate engagement with biodiversity and nature loss can be simultaneously proactive and limited, and why ecological responsibilities can remain precariously embedded within organisational practice.
  • Overall, the research helps explain the conditions under which organisations engage with, and remain constrained in responding to, planetary ecological change.

Next Steps

For business leaders, these insights suggest a practical sequence for moving biodiversity and nature from momentary awareness into enduring organisational responsibility. Leaders can create triggers that make otherwise distant ecological impacts visible, for example through site visits, supplier stories, scenario exercises or nature-risk data; from those impacts in terms relevant to particular functions and strategic choices; and embed responsibility in routine decision processes such as investment appraisal, procurement criteria, risk registers, role descriptions, performance measures and board oversight. They can also support internal sustainability champions by giving them access to decision forums and helping them build coalitions across finance, operations and procurement. Periodic review of these arrangements can reveal whether responsibility remains dependent on a few committed individuals rather than being shared across the organisation.

Patrick completed his PhD in May 2026 and subsequently moved into a Postdoctoral Research Fellowship at the Stockholm School of Economics, where he now researches sustainable supply chains governance in extreme contexts.

His postdoctoral work extends this agenda from the internal organisation to supply chains, where information, authority and accountability are distributed across corporate actors. It provides the next setting in which to examine how sustainability responsibilities are negotiated and translated into governance arrangements and decision processes across organisational boundaries.

This continuing research trajectory will help clarify which governance arrangements enable corporate actors and supply-chain partners to sustain action when ecological and wider sustainability challenges are complex, contested or slow-moving.

Other RENEW activity in this space includes working to integrate biodiversity resilience into impact metrics used by business, and developing a methodology using the Life Cycle Assessment approach to quantify biodiversity impacts.

Publications




University of Exeter logo National Trust logo NERC logo
renew@exeter.ac.uk